Information
Factsheets
TAX
ASPECTS OF PROPERTY INVESTMENT
Investment in property has been and
continues to be a popular form of investment by many people. It is seen as
a route by which:
- relatively secure capital gains can be
made on eventual sale
- income returns can be generated
throughout the period of ownership
- mortgage finance is covered in
repayment terms by the security of the eventual sale of the property
and in interest terms by the rental income.
Of course, the net returns in capital and
income will depend on a host of factors. But on the basis that the
investment appears to make commercial sense what tax factors should you
take into account?
This factsheet summarises the main tax issues which apply for the current
tax year 2008/09.
There are a number of significant changes to the CGT system for 2008/09 as
neither indexation allowance nor taper relief are available for any
disposals on or after 6 April 2008. Further details of how CGT will
operate from 2008/09 onwards are outlined in the Capital Gains Tax
factsheet.
Due to the changes to the CGT system any disposals of property could
result in significantly higher tax liabilities compared to recent years.
Who or What Should
Purchase the Property?
An initial decision needs to be made
whether to purchase the property:
- as an individual
- as joint owner or via a partnership
(often with a spouse)
- via a company.
There are significant differences in the
tax effects of ownership by individuals or a company.
Deciding the best medium will depend on a number of factors.
Commercial Property
You are currently trading as a
limited company
The personal purchase of new offices or other buildings and the charging
of rent for the use of the buildings to your company is very tax efficient
from an income tax position as:
- the rental you receive from the
company allows sums to be extracted without national insurance
- the company will claim a corporate tax
deduction for the rent
- finance costs will be deductible from
the rents.
Capital gains
Capital gains on the disposal of an asset are generally calculated by
deducting the cost of the asset from the proceeds on disposal. Tax is paid
on the gain after deduction of the annual exemption at a flat rate of 18%.
Capital gains tax and Entrepreneurs’ Relief (ER)
Unfortunately ER is unlikely to be available on the disposal of business
premises used by your company where rent is paid. This is due to the
restrictions on obtaining the relief on what is known as an “associated
disposal”. These restrictions include the common situation where a
property is currently in personal ownership, but is used in an unquoted
company or partnership trade in return for a rent. Representations
have been made by various bodies on this issue due to the fact that under
the old taper relief provisions such assets would have mainly qualified as
business assets. At time of writing, under the new ER provisions such
relief would be diluted or unavailable so we will be keeping a watch for
developments in this area.
Residential Property
The decision as to who should own a
residential property to let is a balancing act depending on overall
financial objectives.
The answer will be dependent on the following factors:
- do you already run your business
through your own company?
- how many similar properties do you
want to purchase in the future?
- do you intend to sell the property and
when?
Do you already have a company?
If you already run your business through a company it may be more
tax efficient to own the property personally as you will be able to make
use of your CGT annual exemption (and spouse’s annual exemption if
jointly owned) on eventual disposal to reduce the gain.
The net rental income will be taxed at your marginal rate of tax, but if
you are financing the purchase with a high percentage of bank finance, the
income tax bill will be relatively small.
In contrast, a company can still currently use indexation allowance to
reduce a capital gain. This effectively uplifts the cost of the property
by the increase in the Retail Price Index over the period of ownership.
Indexation is not available to reduce the gain on the disposal by an
individual so in situations where indexation allowance is substantial,
this could result in lower gains.
The net rental income will be taxed at the company’s marginal rate of
tax, which is generally lower than for an individual but again if the
purchase is being financed with a high percentage of loan/bank finance,
the corporation tax bill will be relatively small.
But there are other factors to consider:
- there is frequently a further tax
charge should you wish to extract any of the proceeds from the company
- inserting the property into an
existing company may result in your shareholding in that company not
qualifying for ER
- if you form another company to protect
the trading status of the existing company, that may increase the
corporation tax bill on your trading company (because of ‘associated
company’ rules).
If you do not have a company at
present
Personal or joint ownership may be the more appropriate route but there
are currently significant other advantages of corporate status
particularly if you expect that:
- you will be increasing your investment
in residential property and
- you are unlikely to be selling the
properties on a piecemeal basis or
- you are mainly financing the initial
purchases of the property from your own capital.
If so, the use of a company as a tax
shelter for the net rental income can be attractive.
Use of company as a tax shelter
Profits up to £300,000 are currently taxed at 21%. This rate applies for
trading companies or property investment companies.
Where profits are retained the income may be suffering around half of the
equivalent income tax bills. That means there are more funds available to
buy more properties in the future.
Tax efficient long-term plans
There are two potential long-term advantages of the corporate route for
residential property:
- is there an intention to sell the
properties at all? May be the intention is to retain them into
retirement (see below Using the company as a retirement fund)
- can the shares be sold rather than the
property?(see below for issues regarding Selling the shares)
Using the company as a retirement
fund
A potentially attractive route is to consider the property investment
company as a ‘retirement fund’. If the properties are retained into
retirement, it is likely that any initial financing of the purchases of
the property has been paid off and there will be a strong income stream.
The profits of the company (after paying corporation tax) can be paid out
to you and/or your spouse as shareholders.
To the extent that the dividends when added to your other income do not
exceed your personal allowances and the basic rate band (currently £41,435),
there will be no income tax to be paid.
Selling the shares
CGT will be due on the gain on the eventual sale of the shares.
The share route may also be more attractive to the purchaser of the
properties rather than buying the properties directly, as they will only
have 0.5% stamp duty to pay rather than the potentially higher sums of
stamp duty land tax on the property purchases.
Stamp duty land tax (SDLT)
SDLT is payable by the purchaser and is a flat percentage of the
consideration paid (up to 4%).
If the property is in a ‘disadvantaged area’ (see www.hmrc.gov.uk/so
for further details) there is no SDLT where the consideration, on
residential property only, is £150,000 or less.
How We Can help
This factsheet has concentrated on
potentially long-term tax factors to bear in mind.
You need to decide which is the best route for you to fit in with your
objectives. We can help you to plan an appropriate course of action.
For information of
users: This material is published for the information of clients.
It provides only an overview of the regulations in force at the date of
publication, and no action should be taken without consulting the
detailed legislation or seeking professional advice. Therefore no
responsibility for loss occasioned by any person acting or refraining
from action as a result of the material can be accepted by the authors
or the firm.
Please BOOKMARK
this page and visit again.
|